Software leaders often face a false choice: should testing be code-driven or no-code? The truth is, the strongest strategies use code and no-code test automation together. By letting each approach play to its strengths, teams cut bottlenecks, empower more contributors, and deliver quality software faster.
The Pitfalls of Choosing One Approach
When organizations lean too heavily on one side—whether code or no-code—the same challenges show up again and again:
- Skill gaps: Engineers and testers bring different levels of coding expertise, which creates dependencies and slows progress.
- Silos: Developers, QA, and manual testers often work separately, with little shared visibility.
- Maintenance overhead: Purely coded frameworks can be fragile and time-consuming to update, while a no-code-only strategy can limit flexibility for advanced scenarios.
Instead of streamlining releases, testing becomes another obstacle—especially when teams frame it as code versus no-code instead of embracing code and no-code test automation as a unified strategy.
The Strengths of Code-Based Automation
Code-based frameworks like Selenium, Cypress, and Playwright remain essential for complex cases. They provide:
- Flexibility and customization to test virtually any scenario.
- Fine-grained control over selectors, browser behavior, and environments.
- Precision that’s critical when working with complex workflows.
For engineering teams, code is still the best tool for edge cases and advanced automation.
The Strengths of No-Code Automation
No-code testing platforms such as Applitools Autonomous thrive on speed and accessibility. With plain-language test authoring and visual interfaces, they allow non-technical testers to contribute directly. This makes them ideal for:
- Regression and smoke tests that repeat across releases.
- Routine workflows that don’t require custom code.
- Broad participation across QA and business testers.
The benefit: engineers aren’t pulled into repetitive work, freeing them to focus on higher-value challenges.
Code + No-Code in Action
The difference becomes clear when comparing the two side by side. In one demo, a Selenium test for a simple e-commerce checkout flow took nearly an hour to script. Using Autonomous, the same flow—with assertions—was built in just two minutes.
The takeaway isn’t that one should replace the other. No-code handles what’s fast and repeatable; code handles the complex and custom. Together, they balance speed and depth.
Watch Code & No-Code Journeys: The Collaboration Campground now on-demand.
Real-World Proof: EVERSANA
EVERSANA INTOUCH, a global life sciences agency, illustrates what this balance looks like in practice. Faced with strict compliance requirements and fragmented workflows, they needed to unify testing across teams worldwide.
- First step: Adopted Applitools Eyes (code-based visual testing).
- Next step: Expanded to Autonomous, allowing global manual testers to build end-to-end tests in the browser.
Result: A 65%+ reduction in regression testing time, faster validation across browsers and environments, and a new “Autonomous-first” policy before assigning engineering resources.
The biggest change wasn’t only speed—it was collaboration. Developers, testers, and compliance began working from shared results, cutting duplicate effort and improving trust across the organization.
Read more about how EVERSANA INTOUCH cut regression testing time by 65% in the customer case study.
Takeaway for QA and Engineering Leaders
The question isn’t “code or no-code.” It’s how best to integrate both. For many teams, this means adopting code and no-code test automation to scale testing with confidence. By using no-code for regression and repeatable flows, and code for complex scenarios, teams reduce bottlenecks, shorten feedback cycles, and scale their testing with confidence.
For mid-size to enterprise teams, this balanced approach delivers:
- Faster test creation and execution.
- Greater collaboration across roles and skill levels.
- A testing strategy that keeps pace with modern release cycles.
Next Steps
Identify where no-code can relieve your engineers, and where code provides the precision you need. The future of testing isn’t about choosing sides—it’s about working smarter with both. Start your own code and no-code journey with Applitools Autonomous.
