
Tutorial: How to Automate with Power Automate Desktop
For anyone trying to automate repetitive and time-consuming tasks, Microsoft has just quietly released a free tool that will make your life easier. Power Automate Desktop is a codeless tool…
For anyone trying to automate repetitive and time-consuming tasks, Microsoft has just quietly released a free tool that will make your life easier. Power Automate Desktop is a codeless tool…
There is a lot of buzz around Visual Testing these days. You might have read or heard stories about the benefits of visual testing. You might have heard claims like,…
Drupal is an open-source content management system used to build websites and applications. Drupal has great standard features, like easy content authoring, reliable performance, and excellent security. But what sets…
Modern Functional Testing – Caveats and Conclusion In reaching the conclusion of the course on Modern Functional Testing using Visual AI, I reach the key question: Can I use visual…
How do you check the behavior of one application across dozens of browsers, devices, and viewport configurations in seconds? Applitools Ultrafast Grid.
You’re running functional tests with visual validation, and you have dynamic data. Dynamic data looks different every time you inspect it. How do you do functional testing with visual validation,…
While Cypress.io lacks support for cross-browser testing, Applitools supports it via their Applitools Ultrafast Grid. You can combine the best of both worlds by using Cypress.io to write your integration and E2E tests and letting Applitools Ultrafast Grid handle cross-browser testing for you.
Visual AI simplifies your functional test while adding visual coverage. Visual AI compares rendered output against rendered output. If visual differences exist, you can identify those as intended or not.
As you know, I’m taking Raja Rao’s Test Automation University Course, Modern Functional Test Automation through Visual AI. Today we’ll discuss testing iFrames. In Chapter 5, Raja refers to iFrames as…
With today’s standards, developers can develop once, test in development, and assume they are done. Legacy QA productivity remains limited because QA must still run tests one device, operating system, browser, and viewport size at a time. All the tools that provide test scaling still require validation one-at-a-time, either because tools ignore rendering or flag too many erroneous visual differences. Until Applitools introduced Visual AI testing with Ultrafast Grid.
Imagine this. You built a page with CanvasJS, and you want to test the graphs. How do you create an automated test for the graphical representations? It’s testing dynamic content,…
Many teams don’t automate tests to validate multiple variations because it’s “throw away” code. You’re not entirely sure which variation you’ll get each time the test runs. If you did write test automation, you may need a bunch of conditional logic in your test code to handle both variations. What if instead of writing and maintaining all of this code, you used visual testing instead? Would that make things easier?